It was a quick visit to the Farnborough International Airshow 2010, I was there barely three hours, but here are my helicopter photos from the show.
I'll aim to provide more of a narrative later, and explain why my star of the show was the PZL SW-4.
It was a quick visit to the Farnborough International Airshow 2010, I was there barely three hours, but here are my helicopter photos from the show.
I'll aim to provide more of a narrative later, and explain why my star of the show was the PZL SW-4.
22 July 2010 | Permalink | Comments (0)
So I have been refused press accreditation for Farnborough International Airshow 2010. That's okay, I can understand that on the basis that this blog has been pretty quiet until now and in the whole scheme of things it's not that influential.
I just hope that the nice media people at Farnborough International Ltd (FIL) made the decision on these grounds and not simply because I am 'just a blogger'.
My blog may not be very important (hopefully that may change with time), but social media is very important, and giving influential bloggers press accreditation is just one way the aviation world can adapt to the wider digital media landscape.
I plan to go along to the show anyway, I have no problem buying a trade ticket, I just would have preferred a badge that properly reflected my reasons for attending the event. Oh, and the press parking is very convenient!
19 July 2010 | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0)
Technorati Tags: aviation, press accreditation, social media
Bell Helicopter is there but no link on the homepage, MD Helicopters is there but is not active (although CEO Lynn Tilton is) and I can't find Robinson, Enstrom or Agusta Westland.
There was a ray of hope though from the grass roots of the industry - within hours of setting up my Light on the Skids Twitter feed I was followed by Mick Cullen of Aeropower, an operator in Australia. He agreed with me on the patchy take-up of social media in the rotary-wing world, but added that he has incorporated social media into flight training. He said: "We are starting a program with our students and building their personal branding on Twitter, Facebook and LinkedIn from their first flight. If it can help them network and land that first helicopter job quickly out of training then we’ve done our job."
If I get to Farnborough Airshow next week I'll do a little more research.16 July 2010 | Permalink | Comments (1) | TrackBack (0)
It's partly dependent on whether or not I get a press pass, as this really helps in terms of access to relevant information. But I guess that's going to depend on the organisers understanding that blogs have an important part in the new digital media landscape. Fingers crossed.
Here's my report from Farnborough 2006 - crikey, I didn't realise it was four years ago when I last went.
14 July 2010 | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0)
I got a very nice email a while back from helicopter legend Dennis Kenyon. He politely pointed out to me that in a previous post where I listed helicopter magazines I had left out the rotary coverage in Loop. The helicopter news and features in Loop are often better than other GA magazines, not least becasue Dennis himself is a contributor.
It's a shame there is no dedicated section on the Loop website for helicopter news - perhaps that's something Loop should consider.
03 August 2009 | Permalink | Comments (0)
I must post more often on this blog - 18 months between posts is a bit useless! Anyway, I'be been prompted to inject some vigour into Light on the Skids by two very nice emails from people who have stumbled across this site recently.
Anyway, time to review my original plan for Light on the Skids (news for helicopter pilots) which is clearly too tall an order for me (am just too busy with two businesses and other committments). So I'm just going to treat it as a personal rotary aviation discussion. Maybe that way I'll be a bit more prolific.
26 June 2009 | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0)
I did the Robinson factory safety course last week, in California.
You can do this course in the UK, but I say go to Torrance and do it there. It's longer and more detailed, plus you've got a better chance of working on your captain's tan. And you get to meet Frank. Excellent.
22 November 2007 | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0)
I've not posted for ages, no excuse really other than struggling to get the time to fly let along write about it. But I was prompted to blow the dust off Light on the Skids today by an seriously frustrating experience.
I live in the centre of a small city. It's great, but I would really like more space one day - perhaps a garden big enough to land a helicopter.
I've been thinking about that a lot lately. So it was pleasantly surprising to come back from a cancelled Jetranger lesson to see details of a nice looking rural property had popped through my letterbox.
I rang the agent and asked how big the garden was. "Not really big enough for horses," came the reply, and I rather stupidly responded: 'But big enough to land a helicopter." The agent said she'd call back to let me know when I could view the property.
Half an hour later the call came back and said: "I'm afraid there isn't suitable to land a helicopter." Having taken a closer look at the details, which included six photos showing clear rural approaches and enough space for to do a five-aircraft fly-in at the property, I said: "It looks like there is plenty of room to me." At this point the agent confessed that the vendor did not want to sell the property to a helicopter pilot in case it 'upset the neighbours'.
I dug a little deeper and apparently there are already a few other nearby residents who land helicopters in their gardens and that this was a bit of a local issue. Explaining that I didn't even own an aircraft and that I would land in the garden only occasionally had no effect whatsoever - the strength of anti-helicopter feeling was too great for compromise.
So - there you have it, if you are looking for a place big enough to land in the garden just remember not to mention the fact you are a helicopter pilot until the purchase is complete!
05 May 2007 | Permalink | Comments (1) | TrackBack (0)
It's rubbish that I haven't posted for so long - I blame the weather. Isn't that what we VFR aviators do in the UK, blame the weather?
On that subject, I did the Met for Aviators course at the Met Office in Exeter a few weeks ago. Excellent stuff. Now I can tell excactly how bad our weather is going to be!
Seriously, I'd recommend the course to any pilot. At the very least you get to brush up on reading TAFs, METARs and those pesky 215s. And you appreciate the work that goes into forecasting.
08 February 2007 | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0)
My father, who spent his entire career in the aviation industry, once said to me: "There is no such thing as truth, only perception." I think he'd just been on a course, probably to prepare him for his seat on the board.
Nowhere is this more 'true' than in the public perception of helicopter safety.
There are some friends of mine who will not get in a helicopter with me. They do not have a fear of airline flying. It's not a personal thing about my abilities as a pilot (though I would understand this if they were more aware of the gulf between a 95-hour and a 1,500-hour pilot). Instead, it is to do with a general perception that flying helicopters is dangerous.
So, I set about looking at the facts to see if they supported the perception.
From the CAA, I discovered the fatal accident rate for helicopters in 2005 was 15 per million hours flown. This is typical for recent years, the rate being very stable.
From the Office of National Statistics, I found the Department of Transport reported a road accident death rate of 55 per 100 million vehicle kilometres. 52 per cent of these were car users, the rest made up by pedestrians, cyclists, motorcyclists, bus users, lorries and other vehicles.
Assuming an average helicopter journey speed of 70 knots (130 km/hour), this works out as 15 deaths per 130 million kilometres travelled.
This extrapolates to 11.5 deaths per 100 million kilometres for helicopter travel, compared to 28.5 deaths per 100 million kilometres for car travel. You are two and a half times more likely to die in a car than in a helicopter.
I know how I'd prefer to travel.
10 August 2006 | Permalink | Comments (1)